Apple and Google and, Oh My!

Create a vendor selection project & run comparison reports
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
A subscription is required to activate this feature. Contact us for more info.
Celent have reviewed this profile and believe it to be accurate.
11 November 2013
Donald Light
I’ll confess: I’m a bit of a political junkie. I read various blogs, commentary, and even news. “The Story” of recent weeks, of course, has been the launch of As I read news items and posts, what is striking (from the perspective of a humble technology analyst), is the repeated mentions of Apple and Google by the non-technical reporters and commentators. Most of these references are along the lines of “Why could the feds not just have given the whole project to Apple or Google? (And we wouldn’t be in this mess now).” The implicit assumptions in these statements are that the problem is something called “technology” and that there are at least two, well-known companies that can successfully deliver really good technology solutions. In terms of technology, these comments are a bit naive. Apple and Google are very good companies, but neither exactly has a track record of delivering consumer portals with search, analysis, and transactional capabilities aimed at the complex data sets and algorithms that is wrestling with. And a reader can search these political stories in vain for mentions of “project management, program management, program office, or governance.” That said, there is still a bit of wisdom in the “give the whole thing to Apple or Google” comments. Namely, that the very real achievements of both companies for delivering value to their customers and users, has set a standard for the digital world, that public and private sector organizations ignore at their own peril. Btw, having read this post, if you are still scratching your head about the title, it is homage to Dorothy’s worried chant in The Wizard of Oz: “Lions and Tigers and Bears, Oh My!”


Insight details

Insight Format
Geographic Focus
Asia-Pacific, EMEA, LATAM, North America