Why Billing Matters

Create a vendor selection project
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
A subscription is required to activate this feature. Contact us for more info.
Celent have reviewed this profile and believe it to be accurate.
We are waiting for the vendor to publish their solution profile. Contact us or request the RFX.
Projects allow you to export Registered Vendor details and survey responses for analysis outside of Marsh CND. Please refer to the Marsh CND User Guide for detailed instructions.
Download Registered Vendor Survey responses as PDF
Contact vendor directly with specific questions (ie. pricing, capacity, etc)
21 October 2012


  • Should DoNotDisclose continue to spend money contacting a policyholder? If this is your single largest investment, then is it not realistic to expect the majority of people would be more thoughtful? Can we assume you have no mortgage which isn't the scenario of the majority of Americans?

  • Thanks for the comment.

    DoNotDisclose needs to balance the cost of one or two ("last chance to pay") emails or snail-mails against the cost of seriously upsetting its customers with an after-the-fact cancellation notice.

  • I don't think I've ever worked with an insurer that doesn't send, by USPS, at least one late/warning notice before processing a cancellation. Of course, mailing the notice is no guarantee that it will be delivered (the USPS isn't 100% reliable) or that the recipient opens the envelope. In a related matter, I don't know of any insurer with a comprehensible direct bill system.

  • Donald - you have some good insights. Unfortunately, the insurance business has gotten so litigious that all an insurance company does is think of ways to protect itself, and, believe it or not, this is through less communication, not more.

    A great example of this is from a broker's perspective, of which I am one. Let's say that I'm your broker and I notice that you haven't paid your premium. I call you, and you don't respond. I call you a second time, you don't respond. I call you a third time, and, you guessed it, you don't respond. Your policy lapses.

    2 days later Hurricane Sandy hits and a tree falls right into your house. You call me to file a claim, at which time I tell you that you have no coverage. There is established legal precedence that would give protection to you because I showed a trend of calling you and I should have kept calling you until you responded. And, the coverage would be paid through my errors & omissions coverage (more popularly known as malpractice), not through the standard writer. In this instance, I, as the broker, would have been better off not calling you and instead letting the policy lapse, letting the burden fall to you. It works much the same way with an insurance carrier.

    Bottom line is, the insurance company should be more adept at accepting payments. They don't perform a labor intensive service (issue a policy, process claims), so the least they could do is get it right. I'd recommend going with an independent agent rather than a direct writer so that the broker can intercede on your behalf, and it's a personal face that will accept payments.


  • Scott,

    Good observation, but DoNotDisclose breaks that mold -- I get a lot of mail, but I try real hard to open letters from my insurer(s)--and per my original post, no communication from original bill to notice of lapse.

  • Josh,

    Ah, the joys of a litigious society.

    I'm guessing that my carrier, DoNotDisclose, was not thinking so much about legal exposures, as just plain not thinking (about how a policyholder thinks when there are no additional attempt to receive a premium payment).

    Good guess that DoNotDisclose is a direct writer. Yes I'll look at agency companies as a replacement.