Too Big To Fail

Celent will help qualify your requirements and introduce you to the vendor
Spotted a missing vendor? Use this form to alert a vendor to the Celent service
Create a vendor selection project & run comparison reports
Register to access this feature
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
Vendor requires PRO subscription to activate this feature
Requires research subscription, contact Celent for more info
12 March 2009
Bart Narter
In the US banking industry people talk about banks being too big to fail, but I am concerned about another phenomenon: the bank that is too big to save. At what point does a bank become so big that if it were to fail, the government would be hard-pressed to bail it out. The FDIC (note that the I stands for Insurance) has said that it is not willing to take a risk greater than 10% of the US deposit base. Some banks are getting dangerously close to this limit, and may perhaps be on the other side of it. Now is not the time to ignore risk management. The concentration of deposits is also a cause for worry [but I worry a lot]. The top five banks in 1995 had 11% of all deposits and today they have 37% of all deposits. Yet, it could be far more concentrated. Our neighbors to the north, in Canada, find themselves with the top five banks controlling 94% of deposits and the top six banks controlling 98%. Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) has over 25% of deposits and Toronto Dominion (TD) has over 20%. These banks might not only be too big to fail, but also too big to save!

Insight details

Content Type
Asia-Pacific, EMEA, LATAM, North America