• Contact us
      • Contact Us
      Have a question?
      Try speaking to one of our experts
      Contact us
      Information
      • Careers
      • Privacy Notice
      • Cookie Notice
      • Terms of Use
      • Office Locations
      Sign up for industry updates
      Stay up to date on Celent's latest features and releases.
      Sign up
      • Privacy Notice
      • Cookie Notice
      • Terms of Use
      REPORT
      Research as a Service: Assessing the Implications of MiFID II on Investment Research
      13th March 2017
      //Research as a Service: Assessing the Implications of MiFID II on Investment Research

      Research aggregators have offered the buy side access to research via a platform with transparent pricing, usage analytics, and budgeting tools. A key driver of the success of these platforms will be the pricing strategy; we explore the implications of a “per report” pricing approach versus a subscription-based Research as a Service approach.

      Celent has released a new report titled Research as a Service. The report was written by John Dwyer, a Senior Analyst with Celent’s Securities & Investments practice.

      Research aggregators have emerged offering the buy side access to research via a platform with transparent pricing, usage analytics, and budgeting tools.

      A key driver of the success of these platforms will be the pricing strategy; we explore the implications of a “per report” pricing approach versus a subscription-based Research as a Service approach.

      Research as a Service harnesses best-in-class technology to optimize transparency, compliance, and pricing of research. In addition, it combines digital publishing and alignment of incentives to create a network generating actionable alpha. For example, Smartkarma is pioneering the Research as a Service model across Asian markets. Its recent partnership with Société Générale is a milestone for the investment research industry. Real consensus among the buy and sell side remains elusive — other than an expectation that the regulatory picture is likely to remain mixed.

      “The regulatory pulse is likely to quicken through 2017 as evidenced by the Financial Conduct Authority’s recent announcements regarding firms failing to meet their expectations in a number of key research-related areas, including monitoring, pricing, budgeting, and record-keeping,” commented Dwyer.

      “The initial focus of the incumbents on the buy side and sell side is likely to be on compliance. However, as new operating procedures are put into place and the research evolves to a peer-to-peer approach, then greater scrutiny will emerge on commercial implications of how alpha-generating research should be monetized,” he added.

      Details
      Geographic Focus
      EMEA
      Industry
      Capital Markets