Paper-to-Electronic Processing in Healthcare

Celent will help qualify your requirements and introduce you to the vendor
Spotted a missing vendor? Use this form to alert a vendor to the Celent service
Create a vendor selection project & run comparison reports
Register to access this feature
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
Vendor requires PRO subscription to activate this feature
Requires research subscription, contact Celent for more info
24 November 2009
Bob Meara

Abstract

Paper remains stubbornly commonplace in US healthcare payments. Available paper-to-electronic processing solutions invite US $11 billion in cost savings, but adoption remains elusive.

Electronic processing is present in most, if not every, step of the healthcare revenue cycle management (RCM) process in varying degrees. The steps of payer payment and payment reconciliation/posting are some of the worst offenders. Payer-to-provider processing is estimated to cost the U.S. economy a staggering $22 billion in 2009.

In a new report, Paper-to-Electronic Processing in Healthcare, Celent looks into the paper intensive U.S. healthcare payments system, the multiple solutions available to address the problem and the dynamics surrounding their slow provider adoption.

Fully electronic payments (EFTs) and 835s (electronic remittance advices) have made some inroads in displacing paper, opening the door for significant cost reduction. Given projected adoption rates, enhanced processing (i.e., capture, normalization, reconciliation, and posting) of electronic data has the opportunity to eliminate $3.8 billion of the $22 billion in total processing costs in 2009. With increased availability of electronic data, the potential cost savings are estimated to almost double to $7 billion by 2014.

However, over $11 billion in paper check/EOB processing costs could be eliminated if processing solutions were used to convert remaining paper to electronic data. These costs represent a market opportunity for banks and/or technology vendors in the image capture and data extraction space. The potential for paper-to-electronic cost reductions will diminish, as enhanced processing of 835s and EFTs obviates the need for paper conversion technologies over time.


"Despite the opportunity, all is not rosy for players in the healthcare paper-to-electronic conversion space," says Bob Meara, senior analyst with Celent's Banking group and coauthor of the report. "Solutions are not highly differentiated, and banks and vendors are chasing a declining market (albeit a slowly declining one), with providers being slow to adopt."

"Healthcare reform legislation has the potential to move payers to a standardized, all-electronic solution, which could hasten the decline of paper-to-electronic solutions,” adds Red Gillen, senior analyst with Celent's Banking group and coauthor of the report.

The report examines the pain of paper in US healthcare. It also looks at solution providers addressing the problem and the dynamics surrounding its slow adoption. The report provides profiles of eight solution providers spanning banks, RCM vendors, and healthcare claims clearinghouses offering EOB/P-to-835 conversion options.

Insight details

Content Type
Reports
Location
North America