SEPA’s sDD (small ‘s’, big ‘DD’)

Create a vendor selection project & run comparison reports
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
A subscription is required to activate this feature. Contact us for more info.
Celent have reviewed this profile and believe it to be accurate.
5 November 2009

The end date for the application of the Payment Service Directive (PSD) just expired on November 2nd. The transposition of PSD into country legislation was presented as the last hurdle before the full deployment of SEPA Direct Debit (SDD).

The European Payments Council (EPC) keeps on confirming a successful kick-off, where to-date 2,607 banks, representing about 70 per cent of SEPA payment volumes, have signed up to the new schemes of the SDD services.

There are no evident signs of significant uptake by banks, least by corporates.

What we perceive from banks, in reality, is an investment strategy focused on applying new direct debit schemes at local level, with a country-by-country piecemeal approach.

This is why I think we should refer to an ‘sDD’ implementation.

A small ‘s’, because in reality the spirit of SEPA is being betrayed, and a big ‘DD’, because each bank is looking at its own backyard and developing ad-hoc DD schemes.

Bottom line for banks

Get involved with corporate representative bodies (e.g., EACT- European Association of Corporate Treasurers) to guide your investment strategy and select key countries.

Bottom line for corporates

Get your banks explain in practical terms how they intend to deploy their SDD (i.e., ‘Big S’) services.

Question to the reader

Is this an area that requires further investigation?

Read Celent's existing research reports.

Insight details

Insight Format
Geographic Focus
Asia-Pacific, EMEA, LATAM, North America