Why Change Cores?

Create a vendor selection project & run comparison reports
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
A subscription is required to activate this feature. Contact us for more info.
Celent have reviewed this profile and believe it to be accurate.
2 February 2011
Bart Narter

Abstract

After years and years (and years) of very little movement in core banking in North America, Celent is now observing activity in both the United States and Canada. A massive movement occurred in the Australian market, where three of the top four banks are switching core systems.

In this report, Celent expounds upon these issues so that the reader can consider whether a core banking migration is appropriate. These issues are coming to the fore.

Celent has delineated three categories of reasons to move core:

  • Business issues
  • Technical issues with the core itself
  • Integration issues

“I think the dam has burst in Canada, and all the key players are giving serious thought to core migrations. In the United States, the jury is sitll out. If there are three successful migrations in the US at Citi, Union Bank, and BBVA Compass, that will trigger a tipping point," says Bart Narter, author of the report and Senior Vice President of the Banking Group at Celent.

Subscription required

Access to this content requires a Celent research subscription.

Subscribers should sign in to access this research.

Insight details

Content Type
Reports
Focus
Benchmarking
Location
Asia-Pacific, EMEA, LATAM, North America