Should Asset Managers Pay for Shelf Space?

Celent will help qualify your requirements and introduce you to the vendor
Spotted a missing vendor? Use this form to alert a vendor to the Celent service
Create a vendor selection project & run comparison reports
Register to access this feature
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
Vendor requires PRO subscription to activate this feature
Requires research subscription, contact Celent for more info
9 May 2017
Kelley Byrnes

Last week a wealth management firm announced it would stop selling Vanguard mutual funds, though clients of the firm can still add money to existing Vanguard investments through 1Q18 and purchase Vanguard ETFs. Like many in the investment industry, my first thought was that this firm did this because Vanguard does not pay for the distribution of its funds (aka “shelf space”).

This week that same firm told InvetmentNews that they decided to stop selling Vanguard mutual funds because they are trying to treat all asset managers the same. In this case, the argument is that all other asset managers are paying for shelf space, so to eliminate a conflict of interest it makes sense for them to stop selling the funds that do not pay for shelf space. Personally, I think there would be less of a conflict of interest if asset managers did away with the tradition of paying for shelf space.

For those wealth management firms looking to pair down the products that they offer clients, there are solutions available to help them prune out the bad funds – those that may be stale or that charge unnecessarily high loads. I discuss these solutions in my latest report Regulation as an Impetus or Change: Technology Solutions for Fiduciary Responsibility.

sign in or register to read more