Tug of War: The Competing Forces That Drive Insurance Technology Strategy

Create a vendor selection project & run comparison reports
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
A subscription is required to activate this feature. Contact us for more info.
Celent have reviewed this profile and believe it to be accurate.
22 April 2010
Craig Beattie

Abstract

When evaluating solutions, enterprise architects have to balance a wide variety of requirements. This report presents a new way of thinking about conflicting requirements that frequently appear when assessing technology solutions.

In a new report, Tug of War: The Competing Forces That Drive Insurance Technology Strategy, Celent presents a model designed to aid in evaluating technology solutions. The model challenges insurers to understand their organisations and their key drivers.

“Methods for evaluating information technology solutions often give the impression that the various criteria and requirements are independent when this isn’t the case,” says Craig Beattie, analyst with Celent’s Insurance Group and author of the report.

This report presents a model based on five common requirements or criteria that are used to evaluate IT strategy and solutions. The criteria have been deliberately defined in the model to reduce overlap and to emphasize the tension between them. The model provides a useful discussion point in prioritising an insurer’s activities and seeking consistency in an insurer’s IT strategy.

Subscription required

Access to this content requires a Celent research subscription.

Subscribers should sign in to access this research.

Insight details

Content Type
Reports
Focus
Industry Trends, Technology trends, Vendor landscape
Location
Asia-Pacific, EMEA, LATAM, North America