Lights, Camera, Transaction? Not So Fast

Create a vendor selection project
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
A subscription is required to activate this feature. Contact us for more info.
Celent have reviewed this profile and believe it to be accurate.
We are waiting for the vendor to publish their solution profile. Contact us or request the RFX.
Projects allow you to export Registered Vendor details and survey responses for analysis outside of Marsh CND. Please refer to the Marsh CND User Guide for detailed instructions.
Download Registered Vendor Survey responses as PDF
Contact vendor directly with specific questions (ie. pricing, capacity, etc)
22 May 2018

Why Assisted Self-Service Is Slow to Take Hold

Key research questions

  • Why have so few institutions implemented assisted self-service?
  • What factors will drive or limit future adoption?
  • What use cases are most promising?


Video tellers won't be the face of branch banking anytime soon.

Assisted self-service remains a polarizing topic in retail banking, with fewer deployments than many expected. Is there a future for assisted self-service in North American bank branches? If so, where will it show up?

Once considered heresy by many banks, branch assisted self-service is emerging as a mechanism for institutions to balance customer experience and cost of delivery — inside the branch, in the vestibule, in the drive-through, and at remote locations. Moreover, institutions now have a wide range of compelling options compared to just several years ago. Now, many solutions combine efficient self-service capability with seamless staff assistance options available for customers on demand, using either laptops for in-person assistance or video for remote assistance. But, adoption has been tepid. What gives? Celent unpacks the many demand-limiting factors that have slowed adoption of in-branch assisted self-service and why its use will continue to remain sluggish in most markets.