Lights, Camera, Transaction? Not So Fast

Create a vendor selection project & run comparison reports
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
A subscription is required to activate this feature. Contact us for more info.
Celent have reviewed this profile and believe it to be accurate.
22 May 2018

Why Assisted Self-Service Is Slow to Take Hold

Key research questions

  • Why have so few institutions implemented assisted self-service?
  • What factors will drive or limit future adoption?
  • What use cases are most promising?


Video tellers won't be the face of branch banking anytime soon.

Assisted self-service remains a polarizing topic in retail banking, with fewer deployments than many expected. Is there a future for assisted self-service in North American bank branches? If so, where will it show up?

Once considered heresy by many banks, branch assisted self-service is emerging as a mechanism for institutions to balance customer experience and cost of delivery — inside the branch, in the vestibule, in the drive-through, and at remote locations. Moreover, institutions now have a wide range of compelling options compared to just several years ago. Now, many solutions combine efficient self-service capability with seamless staff assistance options available for customers on demand, using either laptops for in-person assistance or video for remote assistance. But, adoption has been tepid. What gives? Celent unpacks the many demand-limiting factors that have slowed adoption of in-branch assisted self-service and why its use will continue to remain sluggish in most markets.