• Contact us
      • Contact Us
      Have a question?
      Try speaking to one of our experts
      Contact us
      Information
      • Careers
      • Privacy Notice
      • Cookie Notice
      • Terms of Use
      • Office Locations
      Sign up for industry updates
      Stay up to date on Celent's latest features and releases.
      Sign up
      • Privacy Notice
      • Cookie Notice
      • Terms of Use
      REPORT
      Local vs Global Data
      Why Google is no longer a viable solution for KYC/AML investigation & monitoring
      Company sourced
      4th January 2020
      //Local vs Global Data

      Highly regulated institutions face many challenges when dealing with clients and jurisdictions deemed as high-risk. Typically, companies need to go deeper and broader with AML and compliance investigations, which can be extremely time-consuming depending on the tools used. Gaining access to reliable, accurate and up-to-date content on lesser-known entities and individuals is getting harder.

      Google is still the number one go-to resource for most compliance teams, but as it evolves rapidly to match a complex landscape of local privacy laws, changing user habits and a multitude of other factors, this raises the question: is it still a valid tool for use in KYC, EDD and AML investigations?

      Download our white paper which includes information on how Google has changed, a study based on Arachnys vs Google and some tips on "how to reduce the noise".

      Contact Details
      Arachnys
      Visit website
      Contact company here
      • Arrow right
      • Arrow right
      Details
      Geographic Focus
      Asia-Pacific, EMEA, North America
      Horizontal Topics
      Risk: Financial Risk Management, Risk: Operational Risk Management
      Industry
      Corporate Banking, Retail Banking